27 Jul 2008 04:00 pm

Writer’s Block July 27

July 27, 2008

Are Herniated Discs Caused by Age?

Here’s a question about herniated discs I received the other day that touches on a hot button topic for many people…

Dear Dean,

Ever since my MRI came back showing herniated discs at L3-4 and L4-5 I’ve been reading everything I can find about disc degeneration.

[snip]

One article I read said that disc degeneration is just part of the aging process. If that’s true, why doesn’t everyone my age (over 50) have herniated discs?

What are your thoughts?

Sam

Hi Sam,

Thanks for writing.

You’ve raised a very interesting question.

Is aging a primary cause of herniated discs?

Since you didn’t mention a particular article, I took the liberty of hunting up a similar statement to use for the sake of illustration…

“Although daily activities may cause the nucleus to press against the annulus, the body is normally able to withstand this pressure. However, as the annulus ages, it tends to crack and tear.” [1]

Although the paragraph I pulled this quote from does not come right out and say that age is the cause of herniated discs, anyone reading the above could very easily make that assumption.

The average layman (such as myself) will undoubtedly conclude that cracking and tearing of the annulus (the outer ring of the disc) is strictly related to the aging process and therefore, aging must be the cause of herniated discs.

However, if you’re a natural born skeptic with a nasty habit of questioning everything you read, you may begin to wonder, “If age is the cause…”

  • Why doesn’t everyone past a certain age have herniated discs?
  • Why don’t all of our discs degenerate and rupture?
  • Why do some 20 year-olds have herniated discs while many 60, 70 and even 80 year olds do not?
  • And why is it that Nelson and others have produced research showing that discs can heal and the bulges resorb. [2]

Have these doctors found the fountain of youth? Or is the age explanation simply wrong?

My guess is the age assumption is not exactly wrong. It is merely an oversimplification. The above writer (or his editor) was probably attempting to be brief and simply picked what he thought was the best example (i.e., aging) from among the various causes of disc degeneration.

So, while the above quote may be technically correct, it is obviously incomplete and that makes it a bit inaccurate. There must be other factors involved.

For example, McGill writes…

“Herniations tend to occur in younger spines (Adams and Hutton, 1985) … Older spines do not appear to exhibit classic extrusion of nuclear material but rather are characterized by delamination of the annulus layer and radial cracks…” [3]

So we see that while age does seem to correspond to cracking and tearing — as our original quote indicated — this does not necessarily lead to disc herniation.

Instead, according to McGill, it is younger spines that are more inclined to rupture.

To further clarify things, McGill lists what I believe to be a more insidious cause of herniated discs (emphasis mine)…

“Epidemiological data link herniation with sedentary occupations and the sitting posture (Videman, Nurminen, and Troup, 1990). In fact, Wilder and colleagues (1988) documented annular tears in young calf spines from prolonged simulated sitting postures and cyclic compressive loading (i.e., simulated truck driving).” [3]

So, based on this additional information, it would seem that — while age does appear to take a toll on intervertebral discs — herniation appears to be caused by other more destructive factors such as prolonged sitting, compressive loading, and inactivity.

Summation and Hypothesis

Aging is obviously a factor in any degenerative condition. As people get older they begin to notice that their skin, hair, joints, bones and other tissues aren’t what they used to be.

So it stands to reason that older people, to a certain degree, are going to be more susceptible to disc degeneration.

However, I believe it’s incorrect to make aging the primary scapegoat.

Instead, I believe that inactivity and compressive loading are the real culprits and that age is merely a supporting cast member (along with other possibilities such as smoking, poor diet, and external trauma).

Suffice it to say, I believe we do ourselves a disservice to focus on age as the main cause of herniated discs, especially when there is research available that indicates otherwise.

We’re not through with this subject (i.e., the real cause of herniated discs). I intend to continue it in an upcoming post so stay tuned.

Till then,
Dean

References:

1. Orthogate, Lumbar Disc Herniation (eOrthopod) Friday, 28 July 2006

2. Nelson, B. The Herniated Disc: New Concepts and Treatments. Physicians Neck & Back Clinics [2005]

3. McGill, S. Low Back Disorders, Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation, 2nd Edition. (p. 44-47) Human Kinetics (2007)

********************

One Response to “Writer’s Block July 27”

  1. on 06 Aug 2008 at 5:05 am 1.owen said …

    it is my undersatnding that disc herniations but nature are extremely rare in the eldery. The fluidity of the nucleous pulposa reduces with age, and therefore is unable to herniate in the elderly patient.
    Fisure / tears in the anullus with provide symptoms of back pain due to the present nociceptors in the tissues and the irritation this causes is likely to cause radicular signs. but i believe the rate of disc herniation is very low.
    regards owen h

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply